Dakota Access Pipeline Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Scrap Environmental Study Order
NEW YORK (Reuters) — Dakota Access asked the U.S. Supreme Court to revisit whether the largest pipeline out of the North Dakota oil basin requires additional environmental review.
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia scrapped a key environmental permit for the pipeline last year and ordered an additional environmental study. Native American tribes and environmental groups have argued the pipeline threatens to contaminate the Missouri River and vital drinking water sources.
Energy Transfer, which operates the 570,000 barrel-per-day (bpd) pipeline out of the Bakken shale basin, has said its pipeline is safe.
The company said in its petition additional review is unnecessary and that it would impose burdens for other large infrastructure projects.
"This case carries enormous ramifications for the oil industry, its workers, and the nation," the pipeline operators said in the petition.
The company did not immediately comment on Monday. Lawyers for the tribes did not immediately comment.
Related News
Related News
- Enbridge Bolsters U.S. Gulf Coast Export Capacity with $3 Billion Moda Midstream Buy
- PennEast to End Development of Pennsylvania-New Jersey Natural Gas Pipeline
- Canada Formally Invokes 1977 Pipeline Treaty with US Over Line 5 Dispute
- Enbridge's Long-Delayed Line 3 Oil Pipeline Project to Start Up Oct. 1
- FERC Blesses MVP’s Use of Trenchless Technology
- PennEast to End Development of Pennsylvania-New Jersey Natural Gas Pipeline
- Eni's Brass River Crude Exports Halted after Pipeline Explosions
- 1,200 Mile CO2 Pipeline to Create Positive Ripples in its Community
- Equinor Halts Oil Exports from Norway Terminal Due to Demonstration
- Energy, Manufacturing, Labor and Business Groups Urge Senate to Oppose Punitive Natural Gas Tax
Comments