May 2011, Vol. 238 No. 5
Features
Regency Energy A Model For Midstream Sector
Dallas-based Regency Partners LP seems as though it was destined for success as a midstream operator. Regency owns 5,252 miles of gathering pipeline, eight active midstream-operated treating/processing plants and 790,000 horsepower of third-party revenue-generating compression.
Regency’s assets also include a 49.99% ownership interest in the Haynesville Joint Venture which owns the Regency Intrastate Gas System, consisting of 450 miles of intrastate pipeline in north Louisiana, and a 49.9% interest in the Midcontinent Express Pipeline, which consists of 507 miles of interstate pipeline stretching from southeast Oklahoma to an interconnect in Alabama. Regency’s assets are located in some of the most prolific gas-producing regions of the United States, including the Haynesville, Eagle Ford, Barnett, Fayetteville and Marcellus shales.
Regency has three primary reporting segments:gathering and processing, transportation and contract compression.
Shannon A. Ming was elected senior vice president of finance and investor relations of Regency GP LLC in November 2010. She has been with the company for five years, joining Regency after spending nearly five years with TXU Corp.
P&GJ: From your perspective, where are the best shale prospects in North America? How long can we expect this boon to last?
Ming:
We believe wet gas will continue to have a significantly higher value over dry gas for the foreseeable future, and we expect to see NGLs continue to price significantly higher on a Btu basis. Therefore, we believe the shale plays that will receive significant investment and interest include the Eagle Ford, Bakken and Niaroba.
With fracing issues being resolved there, we are also seeing increased activity in the Haynesville shale, where Regency has built a significant G&P, transportation and treating presence.
P&GJ: What is the prospect for pipeline development in these areas and what new infrastructure does Regency have planned?
Ming:
P&GJ: Overall in North America, do you see the new market dynamics dictating where future pipeline development and expansion is most likely? Do you think the number of planned pipeline miles is sufficient to handle near-term production from the various plays?
Ming:
Ming:
P&GJ: What precisely is Regency’s role as a producer, transporter, processor, marketer?
Ming:
With our recently announced joint venture with Energy Transfer, we will now be able to provide producers with significant NGL takeaway options, storage and fractionation.
P&GJ: Do you feel there is a lack of NGL infrastructure for transport and fractionation? If so, what do you perceive as the key for continued NGL development?
Ming:
P&GJ: Is today’s low-price environment for natural gas affecting your planning, and are there any ways you can leverage against that?
Ming:
P&GJ: How has your asset mix changed in the past few years and do you foresee further changes coming up? What businesses would you primarily like to focus on?
Ming:
In 2008, we added additional gathering assets in the mid-continent area, additional gathering and processing assets in north Louisiana and a contract compression business to our portfolio.
The greatest transformation at Regency occurred in 2010 – most notably with Energy Transfer Equity’s acquisition of 100% of our general partner interest. Energy Transfer brings significant expertise in the midstream sector and the potential to leverage growth opportunities between our two companies, as we just saw with our new joint venture to acquire LDH.
Also in 2010, Regency increased its joint ownership interest in the Regency Intrastate Gas Systems (RIGS) in the Haynesville shale by 6.99% and acquired our first interest in an interstate pipeline through the purchase of a 49.9% stake in the Midcontinent Express Pipeline from Energy Transfer.
In addition to expanding our transportation assets, we further diversified our portfolio to include robust contract treating services through the acquisition of Zephyr Gas Services in September. With the announcement of our JV with Energy Transfer, our evolution will accelerate with the addition of a suite of NGL service offerings.
P&GJ: What have been some of the challenges that you’ve encountered in working the shale plays?
Ming:
P&GJ: Is the shale now the centerpiece of the midstream natural gas sector, and what do you consider the most challenging aspect going forward as a midstream operator?
Ming:
Comments